Artificial Intelligence will soon replace teachers in the room. Do you agree with this statement?
What is an alternative to traditional face-to-face teaching?
Some people say that the Conventional education system is going to be replaced by AI in the future. AI can challenge classroom education to some extent, but it can never replace the old ways of learning things. In my opinion, there is no alternative to the face to face education in the long run.
A machine can only train people to some extent, but it can never teach students. The conventional setup is not just about teaching the subjects. It also focuses on molding the students with moral values and discipline. Education should be considered as a way of imparting knowledge and providing holistic development in a student’s life. In India, We have lots of first-generation engineers that have come out of classroom education and made a mark for themselves in this society. A machine can never accomplish even half of what I have discussed so far.
Amidst the event of covid-19, the classroom training got shifted to digital platforms for the past 2 years. In the past 2 years, the most important thing the students missed is their classrooms and their camaraderie. The teachers were not able to teach everything to the student like they used to. So in my opinion digital education could not match what a classroom could offer. So there is no way that an Artificial Intelligence system can replace our holistic classroom education system.
In conclusion, AI can never take the place of classroom learning. A classroom can develop and build individuals where-in an AI can only train students to perform tasks. The classroom will remain the most successful way of teaching bylooking at what the alternative education could achieve.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he alternative education could achieve.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97090909091 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90145361118 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530909090909 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.6302684244 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.4117647059 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1764705882 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138763451863 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048036074246 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05221083048 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884750640984 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210411054954 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.