Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Indubitably, globalization has made the world global village, and countries are becoming a lot more similar than ever before. It is often argued that people can buy the same products from anywhere around the world. However, it is a constructive as well as destructive trend that I will explain in detail.
Buying the same products globally holds a wide range of constructive benefits. To commence with, people can purchase any international branded items easily with the help of online internet shopping. Secondly, customers can get an enormous amount of choices of products with higher quality as well as affordable prices. For example, perfumes that are manufactured in Dubai can be easily bought from e-commerce websites. In addition to this, a Toyota Japanese brand has a lot of outlets in India, which is more helpful for Indians in buying the Toyota cars without wasting travel expense to Japan.
On the other hand, it has myriad detrimental effects. Chiefly, it has often caused the loss of culture and diversity of many countries because most of the latest infrastructures have been designed similarly whether it's a commercial building or a residential complex. The local business has been negatively affected because of the availability of branded items across the globe. However, in long run, the local products get the higher quality and can also spread their business opportunity globally
To conclude, in my opinion, globalization and similar way of life in different countries have made life convenient and comfortable than in the past, despite some problems. Thus, I hope this phenomenon is likely to continue with more acceptance among individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive trend that I will explain in detail Buying the same products globally holds ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...es have been designed similarly whether its a commercial building or a residential ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1954887218 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82784743685 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597744360902 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 266.0 20.2975951904 1311% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1382.0 106.682146367 1295% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 266.0 20.7667163134 1281% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 134.0 7.06120827912 1898% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250349498846 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.250349498846 0.084324248473 297% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147472827292 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759734576833 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 136.1 13.0946893788 1039% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -206.97 50.2224549098 -412% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 108.2 11.3001002004 958% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.36 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.28 8.58950901804 248% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 9.78957915832 562% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 108.4 10.1190380762 1071% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 10.7795591182 510% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.