Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays people at work rather rush than take time to concentrate on quality and safety. I agree with the statement as employees these days are looking for quantity instead of quality which is risk-taking and lowers the value of work.
These days companies pay attention to the amount of work that needs to get done. Working safety as well as employees rights and the quality of work seems to be secondary. It should be banned to work over 40 hours per week, but it is not and a lot of people find themselves overwhelmed and exhausted after work. In result, employees can suffer under pressure which causes stress. For example, I was working in a cotton gin 12 hours shift and 8 days working straight, which was intense and challenging. Lots of injuries were recorded related to employees and several accidents with fire.
To build a stronger connection between the valuable job and make sure everything is done correctly, employers need to give more time. The understanding of producing faster means more money is wrong. Actually, quality is lasting, even though more expensive, people are willing to pay more to receive the expected product. For example, China is producing numerous amount of clothes with poor quality and selling it cheap in the market. Customers are usually unhappy about the products. Instead, they could change the quality better, raise the price and sell it to customers who are satisfied and wear it.
In conclusion, people tend to concentrate on productivity which is done by rush and precautions but eventually, jobs that are done by care and better quality are selling more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use ''.
...rs the value of work. These days companies pay attention to the amount of work tha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 590, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...loyees and several accidents with fire. To build a stronger connection between t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, look, second, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01481481481 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62785542651 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6999835147 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171714685156 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555050783766 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447405880626 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968364797829 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492093917951 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.