Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.
Doing an activity with the parent can foster a lot of good characteristics for the child, its advantage will outweigh reading. Although reading will help the child to become creative, I would argue that the advantages which an activity can bring to the child are far more than reading.
Without a doubt, reading can help the child to develop the learning system. The reason why parents sent their kids to the school when they are young enough is obvious. And the main reason for that is because a person's learning status is the best, they can learn new things fast and grasp them easily. If people started to read all kinds of books at an early age, they can gain new skills easier and what is more, be more creative since they learn new theories.
However, I do believe doing an enjoyable activity will benefit the kids more. Firstly, doing activities can help the kid to develop their practical skills and creative in different ways. Normally, in order to be the best in the activity, there are more than one way to get there. It requires the person to do enough practices and thinkings if he want to achieve the final goal with least effort. Hence, it would ask the child to brainstorm enough to get the activity done nicely. Secondly, doing activity will ask the children to be involved in the real society more, and they would definitely develop more social skills than reading. Last but not least, doing an enjoyable activity can help the child to be happier if he does not enjoy reading that much.
All in all, we should encourage the child to participate more in the different kinds of enjoyable activities, though reading is a significant part of the child's life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...do enough practices and thinkings if he want to achieve the final goal with least ef...
^^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...gs if he want to achieve the final goal with least effort. Hence, it would ask the child t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68918918919 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36102970875 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516891891892 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.952564102 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1428571429 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38143566046 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143220294917 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814385897565 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216313566411 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10839720455 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.