Some people say that historical buildings should be knocked down while others say that they should be preserved. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Along with the development of the technology and civilization, the world is changing at a fast speed. Everyday, numerous new buildings have been constructed somewhere in the world. however, in spite of the increasing number of new buildings, there is a heated debate whether we should knock down the historic buildings or not. The following paragraph will help further explain those two ideas.
In terms of the preservation, both views are understandable. For the people who agree to knock down the buildings, several reasons could support this idea. First of all, the facilities in the buildings are outdated and technology to construct buildings is not up to date neither, since the historic buildings have been designed a long time ago. Even though the building owner would like to elongate the bulidings' using time, it will take more time and efforts to renovate the building than tearing down them. Secondly, taking down the historic buildings would help the city plan better. Normally, current city planning theory has developed much more than the past. In the ancient times, people built a house does not come with a lot of reasons, however, in the present, the city would have lots of regulations in terms of the land use. Under this circumstance, historic buildings would not fit into the current city planning that easily. Knocking down the historic buildngs for the city's future development is much reasonable and beneficial.
But keeping the historic buildings is meaningful in some way because these buildings can reflect the city's past. Preservation would help the young generation understand the history of the city better. Besides, preserving the old buildings would help keep the city's unique identity and assist the tourists to know the city's culture easier. When I go to the new york city, and take the empire building's elevator, I felt like living in the 18th century thanks to the preservation of the buildings' interior.
There are both pros and cons to preserve the historic buildings. Perspnally speaking, I am for the idea to knock down the older building if the building does not have many meanings in the city's history. Only moving on without the past can help the city to develop faster and better. Tokyo in Japan is a good example, even though it has been boombed during WWII, the city has developed a more adapative strategy for the city to get along with the new era.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: Every day
... the world is changing at a fast speed. Everyday, numerous new buildings have been const...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...een constructed somewhere in the world. however, in spite of the increasing number of n...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...ntury thanks to the preservation of the buildings interior. There are both pros and c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98756218905 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62227403806 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512437810945 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8407259812 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4761904762 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156945857025 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561204503619 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477291039227 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099731203995 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297568676209 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.