Employers should give long holidays to employees to encourage them to do their job well. Do you agree or disagree?
Job motivation plays a crucial role for both employer and employee to achieve targets. Growing concerns from workforce to the company leads to provide holidays than that of benchmark, in return of quality work being produced by employees. I totally disagree with the notion because it distracts employee from work; moreover, it creates excessive pressure on available resources. This essay will demonstrate the impact of longer holidays on staff and company.
To Embark on, longer holidays from work deviate employees from work to other aspects of life. In this developing and busy work culture, they will get some time to spend with their family; besides, this they will be back-tracked from work. Hence, on return from long break to work they feel obscure to resume it. Further, to this after some exasperated to restart their daily routine. For instance, in a research held in 2018 by a well know firm, Human Resource department revealed that after joining from long break they tend to be dissatisfied and less focused toward work. Thus, seen in this providing huge relaxation would cost for even more struggle to restart their own task.
On the other note, if the workman is on long leave; somehow or the other it will pressurize the available team members. Consequently, this results in downfall of projects and even more to affect company’s progress. To exemplify, in a survey held at an institute of Banking Service provider, 80% of employees stated that with the encouragement of long holidays, others are being stressed at work.
To sum up, employee needs some relaxation or break at work; but, it cannot be too long which suffer others. The purpose should be instead to build extra confidence and boost of potential at workplace, but not to make them lazy at work. In my opinion an employee should strive for rewards and recognition, rather than long leaves.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02884615385 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63056296675 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3720736422 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15302739455 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528891127117 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303001579874 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096717881685 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024211110151 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.