Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information is relevant and useful. Other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the modern era of globalisation, there are a plethora of employment opportunities in various fields. Organisations often enquire job aspirants about their private information such as their leisure activities, interests, and marital status. Proponents opine this data may be necessary and beneficial while opponents deny the same. This essay will elaborate on both views and argue why revealing personal interests is considered not to be an offence in the working environment.
On the one hand, providing basic information about oneself reveals a general idea about the person. Also, acquiring details such as interests and hobbies ensures whether the person is creative and thinks out of the box. Furthermore, this allows predicting whether individuals have the ability to perform multitasking. For instance, if a person is interested in content writing, the employer can provide the aspirant with an opportunity to showcase their talent in the project that requires content writing activity. Another point to consider is that ensuring the marital status can help organisations offer health benefits and insurance claims for their families.
On the other hand, proposing personal information develops trust issues with the organisation. Employees need to maintain privacy with regard to their personal details. This is because they feel that only work-related knowledge and skills need to be focused on and other details are not relevant to be disclosed in a professional working environment. Furthermore, opening up about their status does not provide healthy relationships among colleagues. To give a clear example, if an individual is divorced, he will not feel comfortable revealing it to the organisation.
In conclusion, although disclosure of personal interests and marital information can lead to trustworthy effects, these information help employers gain an overall idea about the person and pave the way to provide their employees with company benefits. Therefore it is evident that the positives outweigh the minimal negatives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...mation can lead to trustworthy effects, these information help employers gain an overall idea abo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... their employees with company benefits. Therefore it is evident that the positives outwei...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65909090909 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07722846862 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581168831169 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.102240857 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214188077861 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06363946316 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390304458958 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128681658568 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312871874659 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.