Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. What is your opinion?*
Recruitment these days sometimes involve employers requesting for personal details of the applicants which may include their hobbies, interests and marital status. Some people are in support of this practice while others believe that it is irrelevant. I think it is important to have an insight into what your potential employees personal life is like at the same time to have a limit to the questions being asked.
Firstly, employers see it as a necessity to get some personal information from applicants, this could be to enable them make a decision on whether the applicant would be suitable for a particular job position. Also, they may ask for these details to ascertain the personality of the individual in the sense of time management, temper and relationship with people. For instance, some employers put into consideration the marital status of their female employees before placing them in specific positions so as to avoid conflict with their family lives.
On the other hand, some people think it makes applicants feel uneasy to give out their personal details and that it is not good tool for recruitment considering the fact that they may give false information just to get the employees interest while their true personalities remain intact. They tend to give deceptive informations so as to get desired jobs. For instance, an ex-convict hunting for a job are more likely to give false information when probed about his or her criminal record.
To conclude, I think employers should always ask general questions especially related to the position of interest and ask less of personal questions which may otherwise sound probing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...fore placing them in specific positions so as to avoid conflict with their family lives....
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...hey tend to give deceptive informations so as to get desired jobs. For instance, an ex-c...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, so, while, as to, for instance, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16791044776 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82112008504 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570895522388 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7034070561 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374081309474 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141569440666 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522000945569 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21051965264 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711139399188 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.