Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is often a heated debate on the requirement of providing personal information to employer at the recruitment process stage. There are two dimensions of this argument, a group of people asserts that giving personal information about interests and marital status holds no value, whereas, the other group is of the view that additional information about the candidate will help the recruiters choosing the right candidate. In my opinion, I completely agree with the idea of sharing maximum information with employer to help them hire the right resource for any potential job.
To start with, by providing detailed information about lifestyle, hobbies and marital status, helps employers to identify the best possible position they can fit the employee into. For instance, for choosing a marketing analyst, apart from academic achievements, recruiters look for a person being more socially active and a researcher. In the same context; for a sales job, HR and department heads looks for a person being outspoken, having convincing powers and an extrovert. All such information can be easily analyzed by reading additional personal information written on the C.V.
On the contrary, those people who are reluctant sharing their personal details are of the view that upon asking for such information, potential employees might exaggerate the information or misrepresent in order to leave an impressive impact. In addition to this; employers may loose on the best resource for the vacant position proven academically and with solid experience; just by knowing their personal side which they might not like.
In a nutshell, in order to find the right candidate for the position, the best possible solution is to gather maximum information about the resource and validate the information during interview. This will not only help recruiters but in longer perspective will benefit employee to choose the right career path during development dialogue with manager.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...didate will help the recruiters choosing the right candidate. In my opinion, I co...
^^
Line 2, column 585, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...personal information written on the C.V. On the contrary, those people who are re...
^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...act. In addition to this; employers may loose on the best resource for the vacant pos...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, whereas, apart from, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, on the contrary, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41830065359 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88501944153 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.8665375927 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.8 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292425063397 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117424746092 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057334326874 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180856517794 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747586471534 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.