Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is well known fact that companies collect information about all job applicants. However collecting personal data about potential employees before they join is a matter of debate. In this essay, we will look both side of the argument and then I will express my viewpoint.
Firstly, many of the companies enquire about individuals personal preferences because they want to see if it matches with company culture. One of the reason for that many companies have various groups and sport clubs. If a candidate is having similar interest it could be beneficial for both employer and employee. For example, Google has its soccer team which partcipates in annual Seattle IT Sports Tournament and they could be in search of players for team, which could be helpful to have new employee which match the required skill-sets for the game.
On the contrary, there is view that personal data is secondary and first and foremost priority should be given to individual caliber and his work experience. How much does a person align with roles and responsibilities of the job and whether they are capable enough to do the it. For example, there is no need of taking interview of candidate if he has applied as a surgeon and never done surgery and is only being interviewed because he is good at certain activity or has particular interest.
In my opnion such information is not much relevant, an individual's knowledge, experience and his working caliber should be priority before any of their trivial attributes.
In conculsion, having personal information when applying for employment is not much relevant, Although is good way to know the individual in different aspect other than just fix set of criteria.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...t information about all job applicants. However collecting personal data about potentia...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...al caliber and his work experience. How much does a person align with roles and resp...
^^^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...d whether they are capable enough to do the it. For example, there is no need of takin...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ch information is not much relevant, an individuals knowledge, experience and his working c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...ience and his working caliber should be priority before any of their trivial attributes....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, so, then, well, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04964539007 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79055258744 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606382978723 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4163354521 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232622130969 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798234083714 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347270567285 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117277759123 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300399625786 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.