Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions.
Do you agree or disagree?
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Nowadays, people are more inclined towards foreign vacations. Thanks to the air travel that has enabled people to explore new horizons with such ease. It is often seen that foreign visitors are charged more on their expeditions as compared to the native people. To me charging extra from foreign tourists seems legitimate and I will discuss my agreement on the same below.
A good reason to charge few extra bucks from international tourists is to raise the funds required to perform maintainance and administration work. Undoubtedly, enormous amount of money is spent on these tasks to make cultural and historical attractions operational for visitors and they should be recouped through their consumers only. Now, some people would argue that why the local people should not be paying the same amount, but we should not forget the fact that they already had paid indirectly for the same in form of taxes.
Another point to consider is that charging more from foreign visitors elevates country economy. As these tourists spend more in other country, this lead to inward exchange of foreign money that is always considered to be a prominent factor of country's economy. Futhermore, there are many countries whose economy solely depends on tourism as they do not have other resources. For instance, south-east asian countries like Malaysia and Thailand heavily rely on their tourism sector as these countries neither have good fertile lands to produce crops nor oil wells or other natural resources. So they have to import most of their products from other countries. To cover up the cost of their imports they charge extra from foreign people.
All in all, charging more from other nationals should not be seen as discouraging them to visit cultural and historical attractions, instead it is getting their contribution for utilizing country's resources.</span><br>
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34437086093 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11266027803 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586092715232 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0514021496 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.92857142857 7.06120827912 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2231038635 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074451492682 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671154482445 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137954575294 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327317229347 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.