The government should ban smoking in all public places even though this would restrict some other people s freedoms Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

The government should ban smoking in all public places, even though this would restrict some other people’s freedoms. Do you agree or disagree?

Smoking ban has always been a controversial issue. It is argued that public smoking should be prohibited by the authorities despite the fact that it can violate human rights. I completely agree with this statement and in this essay I will provide arguments to support my point of view.

First of all, it is a common knowledge that smoking poses a danger to one's health. Moreover, it threatens not only smokers but also those who are nearby. It means that cigarette smoke enters the lungs of non-smokers and causes serious diseases such as heart attacks and lung cancer. According to projections of the American College of Cardiology, a nationwide ban of smoking could prevent as many as 154000 heart attacks each year. Thus, the health and the quality of life of a non-smoker population will improve.

Secondly, public smokers are bad role models for children as they present smoking as a vital process. It means that children may become interested in smoking, even if none of the family members are engaged in it. According to a survey conducted by Russian Medical University, about 67% of respondents acquired this bad habit in middle school, following the example of high school students. Hence, smoking does not bring any benefit, but is only a consequence of children's interest.

In conclusion, I would like to emphasize once again that smoking itself is very harmful for health, but public smoking poses a huge threat to the entire population. I believe that the authorities should think about banning it at the official level.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'common knowledge'.
Suggestion: common knowledge
...y point of view. First of all, it is a common knowledge that smoking poses a danger to ones hea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...nowledge that smoking poses a danger to ones health. Moreover, it threatens not only...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01167315175 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69061575907 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630350194553 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.017561192 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190413344703 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591482111089 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037131146688 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115091581084 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456188555332 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.