Scientists believe that the world is in danger due to environmental changes. Some people say that personal lifestyle changes should be made to reduce the damage to environment, while others think that the government should do something to help. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Humanity has been affecting on the nature throughout the history. There is an assumption that people are supposed to reduce the use of things that can pollute the environment, others suspect that all states ought to minimize all kinds of pollution with the help of special measures. Although, the government’s supervision is essential, I believe that supply and demand in the producing items possess a higher impact on the environment.
On the one hand, the authorities should control the level of pollution not only in their country, but also abroad. Therefore, all governments ought to sign up treaties about environmental pollution and create world nature care organizations. This is because industrial and radioactive waste, deforestation, chemical and nuclear weapon can damage nature, thus states must unite to prevent this catastrophe. For example, nowadays countries have signed up the treaty banning nuclear tests and have established the environmental organization “Green Peace”. In other words, the removal of environmental treats requires efforts of all governments to save the world.
However, I believe that humans should change their demands in a daily life and reduce the use of products that can harm nature. Thereby, people throw away tons of plastic bottles and bags that do not decompose and save electricity and water. It means that people should learn how to appreciate the nature, convert things and use goods many times. For example, lots of sea creatures die owing to the fact that they swallow rubbish that people throw into the seas and oceans. Thus, people ought to change their lifestyle and take care of nature to prevent environmental problems.
In conclusion, the government’s control is necessary, but I think that personal lifestyle changes should be made to reduce the damage to the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reduce the damage to the environment.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38620689655 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91856169682 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575862068966 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7210457851 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.571428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293101933219 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979981304035 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108857549454 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216034763966 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140419112419 0.056905535591 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.