In this contemporary era, people are more dependent on technologies, especially the internet. As internet has become the pivot for many other technologies, criminals are distorting this technology for their benefits. Since the number of crimes has intensified, a stratum of society insists that governments must control the internet to ensure safety of its users, whereas, others disagree with the statement as it might impact their freedom. Although, I completely agree that governments must oversee internet, still I will delve into both the views in this essay.
From the advent of the internet, people are solely becoming dependent on it for education, business, entertainment, communication and so on. As its importance increases, many criminals are using this platform to steal others data without any traces. For example, in the year 2017, a malicious virus named ‘WannaCry Ransomware’ infected millions of computers across the globe. The criminals stole data’s from the user’s machine and demanded bitcoin cryptocurrency in exchange for those files. Even a giant manufacturing sector ‘Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company’ was affected and had to temporarily shut down their operations for more than a year. Sometimes, these cyber-criminals target lives of the innocent people. For instance, in 2016, many young people committed suicide as they were influenced and forced to commit suicide by the ‘Blue whale Challenge’ administrators. Hence, governments should have control over the internet to safe-guard their citizens’.
On the other hand, if the lawmakers oversee the internet, they might curb the freedom of its users. As per the information technology act 2000 of India, citizens’ have the right of freedom to express and speak their opinion in the social media. However, if the Indian government controls internet, this freedom could be impacted. For example, in the year 2019, the Indian government filed defamation cases against few people for circulating false information against the government over the social media, which was then dissolved due to the section 66 of information technology act.
To conclude, although government’s interference over the internet could deter individual’s freedom, still it can ensure the safety of its citizens’.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, still, then, whereas, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68695652174 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14401242279 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585507246377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8363860564 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.411764706 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221687702767 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726345749243 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744835100483 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143618296761 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764752386742 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.