Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
• To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In these days, one of the biggest problems is about ways and transportation in new mega cities. With rapid growth of population and machines’ life, having well fundamental structure such as railways or highroads is a crucial part of urban design. Some people believe that it is government due to allocate enough budget on railways instead of roads, while others think differently. In their opinion, highroads play a key role on people’s routine life, so administers should have special look on it, this essay will shed some light on this argument from both sides and extend my partial support to the former view before arriving at conclusion.
It is obvious that the huge amount of goods and passengers are transferred by train at the same time and it has a numerous benefit in compare with the cars, besides because of the design of the rails and also the number of trains on rails at the certain time, traveling with them are more safe. The next benefit of improving railroads goes back to its economical aspect. For commerce or transfer products and even passenger using trains is the economical choice, even if it is not available any time anywhere. Not only did the railroads help us to protect nature and intact landscape because of its least of path scale, but also they usually use electrical fuel which are Eco-friendly source of energy, hence we are witness of decreasing air pollution.
On the other hand, some individuals think that leaders should put big fund on roads and highways, because they have an undeniable role in urban transportation system. One of the positive point of developing roads is, they are more available than railroads, it means that they do not have certain station for entrain or detrain and even do not have just one way until destination. They give people opportunity to choose a road that they want. Moreover, for short essential trips the best alternative is traveling by cars, even if they are boring or dangerous. The best reason to expand roads is about business. Roads bring us this chance to build a commercial building a long them, and it helps us for growing up economy is societies by creating job opportunity for civilization.
At the conclusion, in my opinion, the benefits of railroads are extremely more than roads. Investing on growing railroads can have deep effect on developing cities, and government should spend more money on them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, look, moreover, so, well, while, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92610837438 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73025529299 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576354679803 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.5716612742 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127452017007 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383685107727 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435222289047 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858093477655 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053395435971 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.