Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that government should allocate larger funds to invest on railways as opposed to roads. This essay completely disagrees with the statement above as it believes majority of population travels using personal transportation, therefore, more investment should be done to improve roads. The essay will discuss disadvantages of railways and then support why roads deserve more allocation of funds.
Although railways connect far ends of the nation, it has been proven less beneficial for people to travel within a city or in state. The principal reason is huge operating and infrastructure cost of this transportation system. As a result, government cannot provide railways service in every state. In addition, the ticket prices of railways are usually expensive for short commutes, therefore, it becomes less practical to incorporate its use on day to day basis. Thus, expensive tickets and lack of network for domestic travelling leaves this means only for larger routes which are suitable for heavy transportation and industrial purposes, such as transportation of oil from the northern states to the southern states.
On the other hand, majority of population use personal transportation, such as a car or a scooter, for their daily commute to office or school. With increasing population in the cities, the streets are becoming crowded and narrower, which are causing traffic congestions, and a result of this, daily travel time of citizens is increasing. Therefore, it is recommended that government should invest more money in building freeways, expanding local roads, and improve the quality of road transportation. The immediate benefit would be saving in nonproductive time which could be utilized in other useful activities. The Times newspaper published that around 30% urban population waste 4 hours weekly because of heavy traffic conditions.
In conclusion, government should invest more funds on building high quality freeways which could save nonproductive travel time of large population as compared to spending on the expensive railway system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orthern states to the southern states. On the other hand, majority of populatio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54402515723 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04448155267 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7229569613 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.928571429 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161515674145 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632677283946 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708842491046 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116060563988 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615971566023 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.