Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.
Poor countries like Uganda and Nigeria need a radical change to improve the economic growth and development of the nation mainly in Healthcare, Education and International trade. However, the issue is not entirely straightforward, although some arguments can also be made against the idea. In this essay, the debate will be discussed and will be given a concluding view.
On the one hand, proponents who support the idea of rich nations helping deprived nations cite various benefits, it can bring to an economy. Firstly, if the government were to enter into the bi-lateral trade agreement with any of the developed nations, it would help in creating the job opportunities in the economy. As a result, the higher the income the better the spending power of consumer would be. Secondly, It helps in improving the standard of life of individuals and society as a Whole which turns out to be a very beneficial factor to the GDP (Gross Domestic Product) of the economy. While, it can allow poor nation to give some subsidy on the high-end expensive medicines.
Conversely, opponents point out their view that entering into International agreement with any advanced country or maybe seeking aid in any form of assistance can bring catastrophic effects on the economy. Firstly, Developed countries can exploit the local resources of the host country while putting their own resources to take care of the facility. For instance, Although Afghanistan entered into the peace treaty with united states but U.S Government still deploys their troops in the host country and it's adjoining nations. Secondly based on the above actions, it can make the developed country more powerful, robust and resources available to use at any point of time to them.
Overall, it seems that poverty-stricken nations should do some ground work research to find out what benefits and what negative events it can bring to the economy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which turns out to be a very beneficial factor to the GDP Gross Domestic Product...
^^
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... Gross Domestic Product of the economy. While, it can allow poor nation to give some ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...e peace treaty with united states but U.S Government still deploys their troops i...
^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: groundwork
...poverty-stricken nations should do some ground work research to find out what benefits and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive events it can bring to the economy.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8037654749 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0765539626 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176080160355 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058525610639 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475458002526 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973975236399 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03502797703 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.