With increase population and even growing urban centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty How can this be solved

Essay topics:

With increase population and even growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots.
What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty?
How can this be solved?

It is argued that along with the increase in the number of people, living on our planet, and in the number of large cities, countries have been facing the problem of being left with fewer natural places of interest. The annual increase in population is leading to a potential environmental crisis. This essay will firstly discuss the advantages of taking care of natural sightseeing objects and secondly, will come up with possible solutions to this issue.

Benefits of natural beauty spots are undoubtable and include various aspects, such as health economy and ecology. First of all, from my own experience I can tell that such places help people obtain emotional stability and peace. This becomes especially essential, when we realize how stressed we get living in metropolitan areas. Secondly, this kind of vacation spots can be a key to development of tourism and help out a country’s economy, as a result. Natural hot springs, snowy mountains, cliffy beaches and endless forests are what people look for shall they want to rest their minds from daily routine. And last, but not least, sacrifying lakes, forests and other natural objects in favour of enlargement of cities may lead to ecological crisis. This kind of activities can end up with polluted air and water, reduction of fresh water resources and to a change in the air’s chemical structure.

There are various steps that can be taken to solve this problem. To begin with, people should be more consious when utilizing natural resources. For example, in many countries water usage is not efficient, especially when it comes to irrigation. Besides, not always resource distribution is carried out in a homogenius way. In my opinion, whether it is water, oil, or gas, countries should improve their relationships to use those more wisely.

To conclude, in my opinion increasing population is a possible treat to spots of natural beauty worldwide, however there are several actions that can be taken to avoid any fatal result.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (3 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, for example, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12804878049 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72835704834 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591463414634 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.468351832 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.125 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342531326745 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945851706711 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053082496812 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197376730659 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186055346617 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.