It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person o musician. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Whenever people see the kids performing at higher level, the immediate reaction is that child is equipped with birth talent. But this is not true in all cases as some people develop the qualities by practicing, hardworking etc. and become the master of that area. I shall explain both views in essay.
People who believe that inborn talent exists have some valid points. First and foremost, some child become exceptionally well in certain area without any guidance and that amuse everyone. It is generally seen that music, sports, craftsmanship and other area require proper direction for performing professionally and general people are not able to do so even with right coaching. Therefore, it is not wrong to consider such people having inborn talents. For example, my nephew rarely learned the music in his lifetime but he is considered best in his college. Moreover, despite the odd conditions, inborn talents thrive and come out as winner.
Nevertheless, there are sets of example where people develop the qualities, skills and mark their impression. Such kinds of cases especially can be drawn from sports area where player started the game lately and within two to four years of span, they astonished every one. For instance, famous footballer Ronaldo, never played football in childhood but became one of the most successful players.
To conclude, there are evidences that support that some people are born with some talents and those people require less support and nurturing to become the master in that respective area, but world is witness that many successful people made their fortune in music, sports, dancing and so many. In my view, although in born talents helps to pick –up the learning, passion and motivation may also require becoming exceptionally good.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me one of the most successful players. To conclude, there are evidences that su...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in all cases, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1937716263 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56668582086 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629757785467 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5020532996 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.066666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278875530723 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764618442423 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407906123223 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145619676761 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441850580909 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.