It has been proved that smoking kills. In some countries it has been made illegal for people to smoke in all public places except in certain areas. All countries should make these rules. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Research has shown that smoking results in many diseases, such as cancer, which will undoubtedly shorten the life of smokers. Some governments have banned smoking in public places except in some certain areas. Some believe such rule should be laid by all governments. I agree with this opinion due to several reasons which will be discussed in this essay.
To begin with, prohibiting public smoking leads to faster growth of the economy of the country. When one smokes in the public, not only does smoking harm that person, but it affects all the people in that area. Therefore, it can be said that public smoking leads to spread of diseases among citizens, forcing the government to dedicate a large proportion of its budget cure these illnesses. However, by simply quelling public smoking, this pile load of precious taxes can be saved and invested in boosting the economy or other important matters. Research has shown that Chinese government has been saving up to 100 million dollars each year by banning public smoking, resulting in two percent additional growth of the Chinese economy annually.
Moreover, public smoking is nothing but pure injustice. As said, smoking kills, so when one smokes in public, what one actually does is not just committing suicide but killing other innocent people at the place, who have done nothing wrong but being in the place.
Despite what was said, it must be taken into account that forcing people not to smoke at public is a violation of their freedom. Although these people have done no crime and are just some smokers, restricting them to be in a particular place is like being behaved as a criminal, which is just unfair.
To sum up, even though freedom matters, illegalizing public smoking is a good move. This act will lead to saving innocent bystanders, saving money and boosting the economy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98709677419 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45241073605 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574193548387 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9553496031 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.066666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287878156975 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104452995042 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637592706548 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155861824535 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550566012842 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.