Is it wise for an industry to replace its experienced but old workers with new and young individuals who have less experience?
It is often mooted whether it’s an intelligent decision for an organisation to substitute old employees with the new ones who may not have much of work experience. However, I support the notion of working with youngsters despite the idea of them having less experience. This essay will bring forth and elaborate various reasons of choosing new individuals over old ones.
The first and foremost reason is youngsters have a good capability of working with new technology as most of their education covered that and due to this, they often suggest new and fresh ideas on workplace. Workers of young age are often observed to be more enthusiastic and energetic as compared to other workers in the organisation. Companies like Google and Amazon are best examples to quote this notion as their most of the employees are having age under 30.
Leaping further towards another reason which is youngsters are having more stamina for physical works in the organisation, especially in the area of mechanical and gym business young people will be certainly a better choice over old people. This practice is followed as young age makes the workers less prone to fatigue.Automobile industries like Suzuki, TATA working for heavy duty items often hire young people to work for them.
To conclude this, it can be said that certainly it is a wise decision for organisations to employ youngsters more often as this gives their organisations an upper hand to work and compete in the market which older employees may not be able to help with.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Automobile
...makes the workers less prone to fatigue.Automobile industries like Suzuki, TATA working fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9765625 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79454992393 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55078125 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.0934262682 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.555555556 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288518028548 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121922588499 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598626956311 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173842407252 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736291443779 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.