Labour-saving devices such as dishwashers and communication tools such as computers are supposed to make our lives easier. However, some people argue that these devices only make them more difficult.
Does modern technology reduce or increase stress?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In the current scenario, technology is the life savior of any human being. The technology driven devices not only make the life of any individual easy but also save time. Many people are of the opinion that these devices have made the life difficult. I am of a strong opinion that the technology has reduced the stress and saved time. There are many factors which support my viewpoint.
Firstly, computers have been a boon in our routine job. They have made the individuals handicapped without its presence. With the help of computers, record keeping and data storage can be done very easily. The usages of posts have been replaced by email with less turnaround time of the resolution. Many manual jobs are taken up by the computers. Secondly, labor saving devices such as dishwashers, washing machines are of great help in the household jobs. One can save time and spend with the family members or kids. The job becomes easy and relaxing.
However, there are few demerits attached to the technology, one become totally dependent on the same. Initially, the change in any of your routine job is not easily acceptable. Becoming habitual to any new device is also time taking and do causes tension.
To recapitulate, technology is the most effective way which enhances the efficiency and saves the cost and time. It reduces the tension and the individuals are more at peace. Adaptation to the new technology only helps us to move forward from our traditional ways of doing a task.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86561264822 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59904791627 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.6917462634 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.7894736842 106.682146367 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.3157894737 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63157894737 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20406705009 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056499882598 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607280040257 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115777233992 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583373198688 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.0946893788 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.08 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.