In many cities, many people are living in large apartment blocks. Does this accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?
The recent decades have seen a rise in the number of individuals who live in apartment complexes, while they used to live in their own house in the past. I think this phenomenon stems from overcrowding and it has brought massive benefits to human's life, although it created some problems.
On the one hand, accommodating in apartments and skyscrapers has many upsides and it enables everyone to live in a group. It means, these people are able to share some expenses such as gas or electricity bills and take advantage of having these facilities without tolerating any sufferings or paying extra costs. Installing equipment and providing primitive facilities such as water, electricity in private houses is an arduous task which should be done by someone who would like to live lonely. Thus, this seems logical that people tend to live in such buildings.
Living in multi-storey apartments, however, can sometimes deter people from proceeding with their ambitions. For instance, people who are accustomed to live independently are suffering from obeying the rules such as being silence at midnights and participating in charges of the apartment. These rules can restrict everyone and they surely lack freedom. Moreover, if you live in an apartment, you have no permission to renovate your flat your flat due to the dependency it has to other flats. For example, constructing a fireplace in your flat may not be acceptable, although it can be fulfilled in a house.
To conclude, people in mega cities are going to live in apartments, as by choosing this way of living they can be enabled to share their costs and receive assists from their neighbours. I completely agree with this trend despite the limitations it may bring to us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[4]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'accustomed to living'.
Suggestion: accustomed to living
...ambitions. For instance, people who are accustomed to live independently are suffering from obeyin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'your flat'.
Suggestion: your flat
...ent, you have no permission to renovate your flat your flat due to the dependency it has to other f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04513888889 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86804504639 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590277777778 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1916055837 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.769230769 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210630356866 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736016136327 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060999762799 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125411396347 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048021169228 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.