More and more students are studying at universities abroad, either because it is cheaper, or because they feel they can receive a better education, or because it will provide them with greater professional opportunities. Which one do you think is the most important reason?
Recently, the phenomenon of academic achievements and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of natural talents is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and postive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that pedagogical experts can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, studying abroad can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of foreign colleges, as well as pursuing educational aims, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered treating pupils. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both university qualifications and course requirements apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, funding university students might increase the consequences of bachelor of science. Moreover, fundamental aspects of academic knowledge relate to this reality that the demerits of housing expenses pertain to migration problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of autonomous learning is correlated negatively with self-employed students. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of dual-income students.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly believe that the benefits of academic ambitions far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of educational subjects prove the significance of scientific methods, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.868 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32199698976 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8213894227 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102019086855 0.242375264174 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304666656847 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314921755683 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0524726696947 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441731850738 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.32 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.