Many claim that the fast food industry had a negative effect on the environment, eating habits, and families.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed by many people that the culture of eating junk food has had an injurious impact on the ecosystem, dietary pattern and personal relationships. I agree with the statement for some compelling reasons that will be elaborated on in the forthcoming paragraphs.
It is nearly irrefutable to say that the fast food sector creates inorbitant amount of waste, since they usually pack their products in use and throw packaging. It has been estimated that a significant number of the global trash comes from this industry itself. Also, to produce these packing materials, countless number of trees are cut down, resulting in deforestation. When the natural habitats of flora and fauna are destructed on a large scale, many species are driven on the brink of extinction. This leads to an imbalance in our fragile ecosystem and is deleterious to biodiversity.
Furthermore, the fast food is convenient and readily available. Contemporary society leads a busy and hectic lifestyle. They rely heavily on the fast food because they hardly have any time to cook homemade meals. Besides this, the fast food is not only easy to purchase but also delicious, making it go to meals for younger generations. People eschewing vegetables and fresh fruits to eating empty calories have harmful effects on their health and may cause health issues, such as diabetes, hypertension, and heart ailments, in the long run.
Lastly, people are giving up family time to eat junk food. Traditionally family members would sit down and have meals together discussing various happening of the day and share details. This family time has been replaced with people eating junk food by own. The more families spend less time together, the more likely they will grow apart.
To conclude, based on the aforemention reasons it can be justified that the fast food industry has had a deterimental effect on our mother nature, eating habits, and family time. Therefore, there are no significant benefits accruing from consuming fast food. People should try to limit the junk food consumption to eradicate the negative effect so some extent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, lastly, may, so, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15697674419 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76596965923 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601744186047 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4373596492 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3684210526 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1052631579 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259183446817 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723512628955 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598782784937 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142852891109 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629350544551 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.