There is too much noise in many public places in cities What are the causes of this problem What can be done to solve the problem

Essay topics:

There is too much noise in many public places in cities.
What are the causes of this problem?
What can be done to solve the problem?

Sound pollution is incredibly common in major cities. There are two prime causes of this and two viable solutions can be identified, which will be discussed now.

The primary reason to excessive noise is the blaring of horns from vehicles, be it private or public transport. In most countries there is no restriction on honking, which causes sound pollution on public roads. For instance, in India, it is a normal tendency of drivers to continue honking without any particular reason; thus, there is an increase of unpleasant sound, in addition to the sound of vehicle’s engine which is inevitable. Another reason to noise problem can be attributed to social gatherings in outdoor venues. People celebrating their private events, such as anniversary or birthday, may cause nuisance related to sound. In such ocassions, people not only blast music but also burst firecrackers, which create ear-piercing noises that seem to disturbe the surrounding environment.

Turning to the possible remedies, the key step should be taken by governments. They should enact legislation on honking, and those who break the law should be penalized in the form of fines or driving license suspension. This will dissuade potential law-breakers from pressing honks without any specific cause and only use it during emergencies. Consquently, this will help to reduce the noise on public roads. A further solution to tackle noise issues from public get togethers is to limit the volume of songs. In this case also, the government intervention is required to impose restriction on decibel allowed in outside places. In addition to this, there should be some control on the bursting of fireworks. People should try to refrain from using them since it causes many types of pollution, ranging from air to noise and land contamination.

In conclusion, sound pollution in large cities are engendered by honking and public celebrations. Plausible steps, namely laws on honking and volume limits on playing media outdoor, can be implimented to address the situation. Further, people should deter from burning firecrackers as much as possible.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31845238095 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88269667532 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.844411027 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0526315789 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6842105263 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222012850796 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067630670809 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501076737627 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128320383305 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166937804725 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.