In many countries, children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility.
What are your opinions on this issue?
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Earning at the small age is a culture in many countries. One group of people are fully in support of this view-point as they consider it as value added in the life. But, another group of people do not agree with this point of view. Before drawing my opinion, both the side will discussed further.
To begin with, children sometimes lost their focus from study as they give more important to the earning because they get the money from it. By not giving priority to the education they have to face problems in future to get success in career. Moreover, children do not have the proper understanding about the ways of spend money as a result they start the misuse of money. For instance, by lake of maturity in younger sometimes they attracted by bad habits and starts expenses on smoking.
On contrary, people have perception that getting money by working is improved the moral values in the child. At the small age, getting experience of the work becomes very helpful to understand the value of money as well as work. Also, the skill to interaction with the people improve which will be helpful when they will enter in the corporate world. Furthermore, paid work by children becomes very helpful to the families which are not financially strong. As well as characteristic of earning money at minor age creates wealthy society.
In conclusion, according to my opinion, it is good to have a quality of earning money in child which creates strong nation and supportive member in family. However, parents have to provide appropriate attention on the activities done by them so they do not ruin their study as well as do not move toward the bad habits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73958333333 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52011343792 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538194444444 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8386481906 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120897204269 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461047230249 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385316185508 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723217562065 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501270479599 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.