In many countries, paying for things using mobile phone (Cellphone) apps is becoming increasingly common. Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages?
The cutting edge of technology has improved the way of purchasing and selling goods. In the past barter system was considered to be the most relevant means of exchanging things till the invention of first paper money. However, at the present digital currency is in increasing trend which could have both pros and cons. This essay will discuss both positive and negative growth of this fashion in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, there are numerous benefits of paying via mobile apps. First of all, it would be easy and convenient method as one can save their time and money. For example, when people have to pay for their electricity, water, internet and other bills by cash, they have to waste their own fuel and important hours of travel. Secondly, it also assists us to reduce paper usage which is environment friendly. For instance, cash money and bill slips require huge amounts of paper which leads to deforestation. Last but not least, it also keeps your transaction secure and safe by several layers of anti theft software which would not be possible in case of paper money.
On the other hand, there are some downsides of paying through mobile apps or debit cards because the transaction can fail due to internet server which leads to disappointments of not paying bill on time. Even, sometimes account is debited but still money does not reach receiver and it takes much longer time to refund that sum to sender. Apart from this, it is not a piece of cake to pay through these apps as it require many documents to set up account and only literate people can operate it. To exemplify, countries like India, Pakistan, and Africa there are a number of individuals who do not have relevant identification and knowledge of the internet banking.
To conclude, Undoubtedly, paying bill online have enormous advantages despite few disadvantages which can be overcome by certain steps such as improving server connectivity and educating people to use these apps.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, apart from, for example, for instance, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95195195195 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60128017531 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60960960961 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7922367549 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.933333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180090460975 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509922086103 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408811567367 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10265095054 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024725863922 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.