In many countries, teenagers are encouraged to find part-time jobs. Some think this is a good development while others disagree. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
Over the decades, in many countries around the globe, youths are working during their casual time. It has remain disputable among certain demographic of society. these people believe youngsters should be motivated toward the path leading to career growth in future. Whereas, some people claimed to be disagree with this practise. The essay will discuss both the topics with relevent reasons and examples.
Encouraging teenagers to work from the early age is a good approach for their potential years. Helping them to shape their career and earn money for their personal expenses such as, paying rent, college fees, and many other. In addition, youth become confident, can handle soft to hard situations, gain life long experience as well as become strong enough to grow progressively. A research conducted in Australia shows that out of 100, 80 people younger generation are international students who are working to rental and University fee. For these reasons job should be as important as study.
few parents mention, teenagers are more fragile and must proper attention and care. Moreover, the most important period of life where they choose their study for their upcoming career. educational study zone may deviate if one opt for job at the young learning age. this may include loss of dedicated, understanding, knowledge, and idea to name but a few. Part-time work may never give what an appropriate guideline can lead one toward success.
In conclusion, there have been several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly claim that the benefits of teenager working far outweighs than not working ones. Guardians are correct on one note that their education may hamper in a greater way but there are some who are bound to do work for their living and supporting family.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...orking during their casual time. It has remain disputable among certain demographic of...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...e among certain demographic of society. these people believe youngsters should be mot...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...oward the path leading to career growth in future. Whereas, some people claimed to be dis...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ath leading to career growth in future. Whereas, some people claimed to be disagree wit...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun other seems to be countable; consider using: 'many others'.
Suggestion: many others
...such as, paying rent, college fees, and many other. In addition, youth become confident, c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Few
...ob should be as important as study. few parents mention, teenagers are more fra...
^^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Educational
... their study for their upcoming career. educational study zone may deviate if one opt for j...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... opt for job at the young learning age. this may include loss of dedicated, understa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, well, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17586206897 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61016261378 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679310344828 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2798618203 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2941176471 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143918033925 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438623810602 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389573017763 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0823977312766 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295061202727 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.