The importance of cars and airplanes in modern life. Give examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of transportation and its corresponding impact has sparked an ongoing debate. In this issue many believe that it has a positive effect in the ever-growing modern advancement where many holds its opposite view that it a threat for the environment. In this essay I will discuss the topic with related examples and leads to logical conclusion.
From the social standpoint, vehicles in our daily life’s has provided a noticeable effect in the society which are rooted in the fact that travelling in short time and convenient moving are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an experiment which discovered that among fifty of people working in office travel by airplane from Sydney to Melbourne every week due to ease of proper transportation and cheap rates. Thus, beneficial ramification of automobile can be seen.
Within the realm of environment, pivotal facet about this argument is that despite long-term benefits of these modes of travelling, it comes with some serious adverse effect such as air pollution, noise pollution and many other. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the automobile destroying the ecosystem, causing the birds and natural creäture to extinct from this world. As a scientific research, undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that every year millions of cars are being made, not only the gases from car at the time of running are emitting but also during the production harmful chemical and gases are contaminating the water and air. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of automobile as curse for the society.
To end, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of car and airplane far outweighs its benefits. It is blissfully destroying our eco system and future generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nvironment. In this essay I will discuss the topic with related examples and lead...
^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun other seems to be countable; consider using: 'many others'.
Suggestion: many others
...h as air pollution, noise pollution and many other. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04314007988 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627586206897 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.2953444038 50.4703680194 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.083333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0947120634484 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0275840112665 0.0925447433944 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406942973545 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0563565317118 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281197491458 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.