Essay topics: Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues – such as environmental problems – that we should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding?

Essay topics:

Essay topics: Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues – such as environmental problems – that we should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding?

Recently, the phenomenon of Space travel has sparked an ongoing controversy which inevitably leads to moot question, Is going to space more important than solving other major issues. Whereas some believe government should assign extra funds for other global issues however, many believe travel and exploring space will help human to understand what’s surrounds us. In this essay both sides of argument will be discussed with related examples.

From the social standpoint, environmental pollution, global warming, poverty, education facilities, infrastructure etc provide some noticeable effect in the society which are rooted in the fact that air pollution and life threatening problems are inextricably bound up . According to my own experience when I was a university student I performed an experiment which discovered that if measures are not been taken properly, world will see decline in life expectancy. Thus, beneficial ramification of proper use of funding by creating proper awareness and facility for the society can be seen.

Within the realm of science, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that space expedition are important to understand the outer system for science and economic problems. However, this activity entails tremendous cost which will burden on countries budget. As an tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by some prestigious university asserted that not only financial investment but also assigning million of people in the construction of spacecraft cannot guarantee success. Thus, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of space funding to be less prioritized over other issues.

To conclude, there has been several compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly believe that the advantage of allocation of public funding for environment and other issue far outweighs space funding. I believe world has many issues which needs attention and there is further room for progress in determining the way to give funds proportionally.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ening problems are inextricably bound up . According to my own experience when I w...
^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...important to understand the outer system for science and economic problems. Howev...
^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ich will burden on countries budget. As an tangible example, a scientific research...
^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...financial investment but also assigning million of people in the construction of spacec...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60983606557 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96144252448 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64262295082 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.7387258157 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.583333333 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 7.25397266985 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184380616474 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629675453471 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488249634837 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109707386632 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529292201094 0.0609392437508 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.