Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some People think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones. How important is to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
Given perseverance of the ancient monumental structures, it is quite evident that such highly sophisticated specimens are considered to be the expensive gems of a nation. In this context; however, a question arises sometimes about their maintenance, whether they should be demolished or refurbished. The protection of these heritage sites is a must; followed by their contribution in economic, educational, historical, and social growth. Subsequently, history is generalised as an ocean of knowledge, but not meant to be a hurdle in any way.
To launch into the topic, with a view to imparting knowledge among the posterity, various ancient exhibits have been surviving their tenacity in order to render entire information of the gone-by eras. Henceforth, coming on to the raised question against the existence of these giants, should they raze to ground, the incoming influx of globe-trotters can be reduced which is highly likely to hit country’s economy. What is more, such buildings are inevitable to drag the youngsters to cherish the memory lane of the cultures prevailing in past; however, pulling them down may lead to outstretching gap between present and past. Unless they understand the value of these huge bodies, the ideology to bulldoze them to the ground is less likely to be changed. Without such antiques, the country is no less than a fish without water. Research conducted by Delhi University, many a tourist comes in India only owing to their appeal to old Indian monuments.
When it comes to the rich architectural heritage, it gives exposure to the sleeping minds of people who tend to bypass the sacrifices of the patriots and also acknowledge them to unleash some unknown facts of gone-by days .Additionally, the eroded moral values among youth can be uplifted if the persistence of these old structures is everlasting. Thus, the terminology to let the replacement occur would be less worthy. Acquaintance of history through these recorded mementos is a prolonged way to immeasurable successes if giving a carefree turn to what a few people say about their demolish. Thanks to the acumen of the law-making bodies that enacted some laws for the persistence of these old remains.
The gist of the topic is that even though some people raise the question about remaking the antique buildings, nevertheless their tenacity is much focused considering multiple benefits: knowledge enhancement, high economic standards, inseminating moral values and rejuvenating past experiences of assiduous people. These embodiments had better not be knocked down. The more stringent laws are planned out for their protection, the more productive it is for the nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'arises'.
Suggestion: sometimes arises
...n. In this context; however, a question arises sometimes about their maintenance, whether they s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 542, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
... memory lane of the cultures prevailing in past; however, pulling them down may lead to...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 222, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...leash some unknown facts of gone-by days .Additionally, the eroded moral values am...
^^
Line 9, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Additionally
...ash some unknown facts of gone-by days .Additionally, the eroded moral values among youth ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 278, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...eminating moral values and rejuvenating past experiences of assiduous people. These embodiments ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2270.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 425.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34117647059 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04855652495 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.4442199474 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.529411765 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20810948238 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595496503787 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344691783002 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115199340734 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223054964408 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.