Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative
impact on both individuals and society.To what extent do you agree?
use of online portals for forming social networks has gained worldwide popularity. it has both merits and demerits and it all largely depends on how it is used. To argue that online providers of social networking has only influenced the society in a negative way would be unfair.
To begin with, there are numerous benefits of websites like Facebook. The most important of all is the ability they provide to the users in sharing information. In fact, it has bridged the gap between societies living miles apart by allowing them a means to know each other and engage in informal conversations. What is more, the entire world seems to have turned into a global village by enabling people to have a medium to interact across borders and share knowledge and experience. A number of social platforms are being used for rallying people and launching campaigns for good causes, which is a good example of their efficacy in terms of information sharing.
On the other hand, these websites are increasingly misused by many young people around the world. these people often tend to spend time wastefully by posting unnecessarily. such instincts can lead to addiction and anti-social behavior. Moreover, school children can fail to realise their full potential if they are not mindful of their online activities, esp use of such sites. To illustrate, according to a survey in Nepal 80% of high school students who had an account on a social networking site had poor grades in their final exams. This clearly suggests these sites have certainly resulted into lack of creativity for students.
In conclusion, being an active user of a social site can be informative and educative, but it depends on who uses it and how. students and other people who do not apply themselves, suffer and become unproductive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Use
use of online portals for forming social ne...
^^^
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...tworks has gained worldwide popularity. it has both merits and demerits and it all...
^^
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...working has only influenced the society in a negative way would be unfair. To begin with, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... by many young people around the world. these people often tend to spend time wastefu...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 174, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...me wastefully by posting unnecessarily. such instincts can lead to addiction and ant...
^^^^
Line 13, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Students
... but it depends on who uses it and how. students and other people who do not apply thems...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00996677741 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73421321395 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611295681063 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3069510112 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.25 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203240483685 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578574490112 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335895651889 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11131487283 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030600430112 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.