Many people think that the government should spend money to explore life in the outer space while others think that it's a waste of public money.
Discussscuss both views and include your own opinion and examples.
Spending colossal amount of money to explore life outside the earth has raised certain arguments among people. While terrestrial projects are quite fascinating the unnecessary findings and ignorance to the global issues caused are quite concerning. Therefore, this essay delineates both the perspectives before reaching to a logical conclusion.
Indeed, exploring life in the outer space is the need of the hour owing to habitational demands of growing population on the Earth. For instance, latest NASA project "Mars Mission" aimed at finding favourable living condition on Mars planet would solve the problem of land scarcity on Earth if achieve desired result. Also, such projects allow scientist to assure if people have been living in other planet as well or not so as to reduce the threats of these so called aliens invading the planet Earth. Therefore, allocating huge revenue for exploring space for the betterment of human existence is acceptable.
Nevertheless, space projects not always are successful rather mere a waste of money. Obviously, a life found on other heavenly bodies would not assist the general public directly in anyway in fact is just fascinating for astronomers bringing them name and fame. Likewise, fuels and maintenance cost involved in space ship programs if allocated for the public would serve their requirement for years. Along with this, the gases exhausted from such aircrafts damage the environment so seriously which further demands high investment to combat it's devastating effects on the earth. The studies show, the hydrogen gas used as fuel for airships produce harmful gases equivalent to the emissions by public transport generated in the span of 5 years globally.
To conclude, therefore, in my opinion exploration of the universe is indeed inevitable for the betterment of human existence but should not be at the cost of existing population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...d ignorance to the global issues caused are quite concerning. Therefore, this essay delineates both ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the latest'.
Suggestion: , the latest
...ng population on the Earth. For instance, latest NASA project 'Mars Mission' a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...n living in other planet as well or not so as to reduce the threats of these so called a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts not always are successful rather mere a waste of money. Obviously, a life foun...
^^
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...er heavenly bodies would not assist the general public directly in anyway in fact is just fasc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 181, Rule ID: IN_ANYWAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in any way'?
Suggestion: in any way
... not assist the general public directly in anyway in fact is just fascinating for astrono...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 632, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... show, the hydrogen gas used as fuel for airships produce harmful gases equivalen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42953020134 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83636262316 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640939597315 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2615417251 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.461538462 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157810186088 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573281498339 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473446634148 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899540110121 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198917274977 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.