Many people work long hours, leaving very little time for leisure activities. Does this situation have more advantages or more disadvantages?
Now-a-days, employees have less free time for their daily life leisure activities because modern organizations are enforcing people for longer working day. This could have various pros and cons, but in my opinion, the disadvantages are far more than the advantages. This essay will elaborate positive and negative impacts of increased working hours per week on both the employers and employees.
On one hand, longer working day could increase organizational productivity. As the workers are working for few extra hours, they can accomplish their two-week consignment in one week. In this way, organizations would have efficient production because labor is spending all their productive hours there in the workplace. No doubt, implementing the same strategy, Japan has excelled in textile production in the year 2017. In the year, the country increased the work week from 36 hours to 42 hours.
On the other hand, having no time for their selves will lead to increased cases of burnout. Workers will face more depression and anxiety, because all the day they are bound to do 9am to 9pm office work. It will not only cut them off from their social circle, but also disturb their family life and relationships. Whereas, it will also disturb their mental health and wellbeing. For instance, according to Japan public and private sector employee health survey, the rate of anxiety and suicides had doubled since 2017. For a long run, it is also bad for organizational growth. So, compromising workforce health just for organizational interests and profits is a not a good idea and will impact overall public wellness.
In conclusion, employees should have freedom to spend some of their relaxation time with their friends and family. Definitely, long working hours will cause few short-term advantages to the company, although deteriorating mental health of workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eriorating mental health of workers.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28859060403 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82610309438 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590604026846 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7360270629 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.7058823529 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220391752064 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693413135214 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534677817269 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14296139282 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654023515812 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.