In many places the role of father and mother is changing. Do you think it’s a positive or negative development?”
In our contemporary society, the traditional belief of fathers are the breadwinners and mothers only do household chores is no longer true. With the advent of globalisation, there roles are changing which is vastly different from their previous generations. Does this transformation is in favour of child? This paragraph will enunciate pros and cons of this development and give evidence why it is positive growth.
To commence with, the first and foremost, the pragmatic ramifications of reforming roles on both partners is that they are more independent in terms of their responsibilities. Indeed, single parents due to abandonment or illegitimacy; as a outcome, are more capable of nurturing their juveniles without the help of opposite gender. There are few instances recorded which shows single mothers are doing laudable job in process of upbringing their infants with enough care and financial support with daily assiduous routine. In addition, male parents also get tremendous amount of time to impart moral values and much needed support to their babies which is very crucial for them. Young generation parents found this reversals very useful and valuable for them.
However, this reformations of parental part has also brought multitude of ills in its wake. Firstly, Daddy's are no more conveyers of religious beliefs as well as decision takers of the family which might sometimes results in disputes between couple; as a consequence, might bring a situation of separation in between them. Secondly, with this revolution, female gender don not look up for their babies anymore and not give them healthy and nutritious food which afterwards culminates in a weaker adult as repercussion due to their involvement in hectic hours of task. Although, this aforementioned negatives are highly considerable, yet it can be solved by some alternatives.
Hammering the final nail. I pen down by saying that new responsibility of both individuals are beneficial for them. There are some gloomy things also which can be alleviated by more caring.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-09 | GraceMowette | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-09 | parmik | 53 | view |
| 2020-04-03 | cpanavdeeppuri@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-26 | DJ | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-26 | DJ | 78 | view |
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that dangerous sports should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. Give the reason and relevant examples. 73
- Industrilization is the cause of environmental problems in a country. Do you agree? 56
- Some people say that in all levels of education,from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.Do you agree or disagree? 89
- In many countries the level of crime is increasing and crimes are becoming more violent.Why do you think this is and what can be done about it?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...s generations. Does this transformation is in favour of child? This paragraph will...
^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... due to abandonment or illegitimacy; as a outcome, are more capable of nurturing ...
^
Line 3, column 711, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...or them. Young generation parents found this reversals very useful and valuable for ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...eful and valuable for them. However, this reformations of parental part has also ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3560371517 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01911085201 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628482972136 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1092429976 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0667103621567 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0212492224713 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318028696836 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0426329813888 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472340399335 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.