News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this?
It is irrefutable to say that media plays a significant role in our daily life by sharing updates on the latest events and happenings. In order to increase media sales and viewership on Television, various innovative ways are implemented and commonly used such as using pictures and videos. A response observed from public demonstrates that some prodigies advocate that having pictures is advantageous than words. In my opinion, both words and images have their own importance as they both fulfill disparate purposes.
Undoubtedly, pictures are one of the easiest and convenient ways to transmit a message as it provides a quick information about the context. It is well suited for the people who are accustomed to the fast-moving lifestyle and sparingly get time to read through the entire content. To illustrate, I recently saw a news article in the Hindustan Times about a fire incident in the building which was exemplified with a picture demonstrating fumes and flames emerging out of a housing society. I was able to grasp the content in no time as the image accurately described the incident.
Although photos with news assists in inferencing news faster, but they lack providing descriptive information where text or speech plays a crucial role in bridging this gap. For example, a news pertaining to a new car launch in the market displays image to flaunt its exquisite style whereas it’s actual specifications and engineering innovations are covered by the reporter in the TV or the news article. Apparently, an information without words is inefficient to confer the entire story.
To pen down the compendium, both words and pictures have their own benefits in conveying a message. Tacitly, their duo makes the best combination in showcasing a condensed and an expanded view simultaneously which is essential to maintain the right balance for a remarkable customer experience.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, so, well, whereas, for example, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23278688525 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06090465854 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626229508197 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5637923312 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.769230769 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143757097294 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426157003234 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371669055905 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718921269628 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318488777391 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.