Nowadays celebrities are mainly famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this sets a bad example to young people. To what extent do you agree and disagree?
It is common in the contemporary world that many eminent people are primarily known for their fame and affluence rather than their talents, which has a negative impact on the younger generations. I completely agree with this statement. The reasons are twofold.
To begin with, most celebrities potraying their opulence are usually infamous for the wrong reasons since they do not actually have the skills to present to an audience. For instance, the Kardashians are well-known for simply being extremely rich and flaunting their extravagant lifestyle. In reality, they hardly have any commercial success. So, young people want to achieve the same kind of stratum in society. They have a feeling that anyone can become wealthy by following in the footsteps of such people. Hard work and education, therefore, take a back seat. If youngsters are not educated or dedicated to working hard, they can face dire repurcussions in the future, since less educated people in ordinary society are not able to make a proper living.
Furthermore, young people may try to emulate the way of life of super-stars, and as a result, may turn into prodigal people. In order to defray the expenses of a luxurious life, they may resort to crime. The chances of juvenile delinquencies may rise. Besides this, they may also find themselves in deep debt, which may take years to pay off. Obviously, when a young person faces such problems, it seems inevitable that they will have severe depression and anxiety issues. The more young people try to imitate their favourite stars, the greater the injurious impact it can engender in terms of financial stability and mental health.
To conclude, since younger generations appear to relinquish hard work and education, tend to commit crimes, and suffer mental illness, this is a sign of the decadence of those who follow people who are well-known for their glamorous lives and opulence in lieu of their successful work.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, kind of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22929936306 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90537336137 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611464968153 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7868121622 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5882352941 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226640495387 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062581411585 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657099648033 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146218703841 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496498735056 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.