Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?
Everyone aspires to have more money to enjoy life with high standards. There is a huge disparity between famous celebrities and political persons in order to earn money. I believe it is a positive development as it helps and benefited country in many ways. The following essay will outline causes and imperial evidence to prove its positive development.
To begin with, many people around the world are influenced by well-known celebrities. They follow their footprints and lifestyle in routine life. As a result, big organizations generally prefer such celebrities to promote their products while marketing. There are very rare cases when such organizations promote any political leader to advertise their product. Thus, it is justified reason that celebrities earn more money.
Secondly, Politician generally works under government departments. So, they have fix income of salary. They have to wait for government’s announcement to get increment in their salary. On other side, celebrities are independent and they can earn more money by doing contract with more than one company. For example, in my country India, Virat Kohli, the great cricketer, working with three companies parallelly to earn high money.
Furthermore, celebrities of sports take part in famous ceremony such as Cricket world cup and Olympics. Sometimes their country also gets chance to host such events. It attracts many people from the world. As a result, it will help to boost country’s economy and foreign exchange. Also, in film industry, many people get employed to run such industry.
All in all, famous celebrities earn more money as they have many open ways. It is also reasonable as it helps country for good development and to earn name and fame in the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
...ards. There is a huge disparity between famous celebrities and political persons in order to earn ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 13, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
...d to run such industry. All in all, famous celebrities earn more money as they have many open ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8292928373 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.7315867278 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.4761904762 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.3333333333 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268349442091 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077595363451 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932898728207 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160317362129 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086181773256 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.