Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?
Nowadays celebrities become most well known symbol in countries. Celebrities are getting money from various sources like film, web series , ads and various serial As a result Some celebrities annual year income are more than politician.
To begin with, There are many way of sources for celebrities to increase their annual income. Celebrities are doing acting in many film simultaneously as the same time they are performing on many ads vigorously. People are attracted towards celebrities than politician in current time thus any products which is promoted by their lovable actor or actress are being more popular in market and people buy those product in terms of thinking their love dedicated to specific actor.
Secondly, Many celebrities are kind hearted person. They believe to help poor people by donation in charity firm. Recently Akshay kumar have donated 25 crore rupees in PM Care fund to help patient who infected with covid19. They are many social positive effect too by actor. Many actor give time on social activity and raise their voice against inappropriate point hence people would focus on that point and give their reply on that subject. Moreover celebrities work on international film and contribute to grow economy by increasing foreign reserve. For instance Priyanka chopda had worked on bewatch movie and had been working on web series for last three year.
To conclude, Celebrities have more incomes sourcing compare to politicians and various positive impact on their follower and they are good one of the good example for donation firm.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...om various sources like film, web series , ads and various serial As a result Some...
^^
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l year income are more than politician. To begin with, There are many way of sou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun way seems to be countable; consider using: 'many ways'.
Suggestion: many ways
...ian. To begin with, There are many way of sources for celebrities to increase ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun film seems to be countable; consider using: 'many films'.
Suggestion: many films
...income. Celebrities are doing acting in many film simultaneously as the same time they ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this product' or 'those products'?
Suggestion: this product; those products
...g more popular in market and people buy those product in terms of thinking their love dedicat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their love dedicated to specific actor. Secondly, Many celebrities are kind hear...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 444, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...t and give their reply on that subject. Moreover celebrities work on international film ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on web series for last three year. To conclude, Celebrities have more incom...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28968253968 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.586333668 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623015873016 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9844161221 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.538461538 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200043002154 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689112549429 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057359766419 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142220923924 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563096790807 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.