Nowadays congestion and traffic jams are a common and major problem in most cities. Some people believe it is a good idea to construct wider roads to resolve this issue. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? What can be the solution, in your opinion?
One of the most controversial issues among the authorities of mega cities is the traffic congestion which is on the increase all over the globe and have detrimental effects on the environment and the inhabitants of these urban areas. While a group of people argue that constructing wider roads would be a solution for this problem, I believe that this is just a temporary solution and it will not tackle the problem. There are various solutions and government should address the problem by limiting the car usage and providing a safe public transportation.
There are some reasons why I would argue that building more roads is not a wise solution for this problem. Firstly, more constructions means destroying the nature and unspoiled environment which is a threat for wild life. Secondly, building wider roads motivates more people to drive their own cars rather than using the public transportation and it will lead to a severe problem which is air pollution that is caused by the exhaust fumes of the cars and greenhouse gas emissions. Finally, by constructing more roads the cities would be uninhabitable in the future and it seems not to be environmentally friendly.
The best solution for this dilemma is providing a profitable public transportation that is safe and affordable for people by building undergrounds and developing the bus system. Furthermore, governments should impose strict restriction in car usage and curb the number of cars in main streets that are always crowded. Moreover, they should develop metropolitan cities in rural areas by building new shopping centers and hospitals and recreational facilities in the country sides of big cities.
In conclusion, I believe not only the government but also the residents of big cities are responsible about the next generation and should tackle the problem by educating people and children and making awareness about the consequences of this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'constructions'' or 'construction's'?
Suggestion: constructions'; construction's
...olution for this problem. Firstly, more constructions means destroying the nature and unspoil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21612903226 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02209174274 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51935483871 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.0480247066 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1818181818 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200264829899 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771707689953 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677497168386 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123083731077 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541413936141 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.