Nowadays congestion and traffic jams are a common and major problem in most cities. Some people believe it is a good idea to construct wider roads to resolve this issue. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? What can be the solution, in your opinion?
In the age of urbanisation, population in the cities is increasing rapidly. This abrupt increment of people has lead to many problems as authorities were not ready to handle this change. One of such problems in traffic and this is getting more congested. Some people suggest establishment to wider roads as flow of cars will increase, however, I believe that this is only a temporary solution and government should adopt other methods to solve the problem of traffic.
Admittedly, constructing more number of lanes will increase flow of traffic, but it should not be forgot that either roads are covered by trees on the both sides or there are number of shops. In both the cases, government can not afford as the shops are very costly and trees are helping to control the pollution and cutting them will lead to crisis. Apart from that, with the rate population in cities is increasing, sooner similar congestion can be seen and it will hard to control at that stage of time.
In order to control traffic, authorities should take some promising steps. Odd Even rule started by Delhi Government is one of such steps which should be made permanent. Afterthat, vehicles on roads should be restricted and no cars should be allowed in the city centres. This will not only control traffic but will also help in preventing road accidents. Furthermore, establishment should spend major part of their revenue on the public transport so that it become convincible and commutable. Singapore Government has done a commendable job in this regard.
In retrospection, it is clear that widening of roads is not a solution but authorities should adopt some aforementioned ways to control unless, it will be difficult to control at a later stage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97250859107 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8178526527 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536082474227 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.614843072 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.357142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209728908234 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767009589847 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524503288957 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129337461534 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674216259447 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.