Nowadays, a lot of children are using mobile phones. Many say it is good. Some say it is bad. What is your opinion?
Cellphones are becoming increasingly popular among youngsters every day. Whether it is a positive trend or a negative one has long been controversial. While some people believe that it is beneficial to a child to possess a mobile phone, it is argued by others that it brings more negative impact than positive. This essay will analyze both sides of argument before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
On the one hand, those who argue in favor of giving young people cellphones claim that it is crucial for several reasons. First, a mobile phone is the quickest mean of communication. For instance, if a child encounters a difficulty or a problem, he can easily reach his parents by using his cellphone. Second, recently mobile phones have been developed. In other words, now a mobile phone is not only used for making calls, but also it consists of games, books, as well as some applications that are educative for children, therefore, they are also considered entertaining devices. That makes it clear why giving children mobile phones has garnered support.
On the other hand, despite these reasons, opponents of the usage of mobile phones by children have stronger argument. Primarily, mobile phones may entice children to spend more time in playing than in studying due to the games on it. Another reason is that the unsupervised access to the internet on mobile phones has serious drawbacks. Moreover, the mobile phones are extremely tempting, that children are more likely to spend more time playing games and logging on to the internet than engaging in real activities. Concomitantly, it affects their social and physical development. Because of these reasons, it is easy to see why children should not use mobile phones especially in young age.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08996539792 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7611502789 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574394463668 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8291664773 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9375 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132196763421 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457978173086 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363228636132 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869996733178 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348691784701 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.