Nowadays many people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development?
Over the last couple of years, there has been accelerated demand for products of famous brands due to various reasons. Personally, I see this increase as a negative development.
On the one hand there is ample evidence that depicts that people like to buy luxurious products compared to affordable products. The central reason behind this is, firstly, buying lavish goods are equated with happiness. Secondly, it is a status and style symbol for most of us. For example, a child travelling in a Mercedes car fetches respect and attention from his or her friends. Similarly, people especially youngsters like to treat themselves with expensive brand products post achieving a milestone in their lives. To illustrate, a recent empirical research by Oxford University demonstrates that youngsters like to buy posh products when they excel in their academic or professionally. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that buying luxury products not only guarantees a status but also helps in creating happiness.
On the other hand although branded goods do promise quality, however, the impact of spending an exorbitant amount on products cannot be ignored. For example, Apple iPhone X is of 1000 dollars whereas other well-known electronics brands sell their phone with similar features of iPhone at affordable price. Furthermore, buying expensive goods will affect people’s budget especially middle class people who otherwise could have saved that money and used it for their family and children’s future. Thus it is possible to state beyond doubt that spending money on expensive products isn’t an appropriate decision.
From the arguments and examples given I firmly believe that buying luxurious products are considered to be heavy on the pocket and does not reflect source of happiness. I personally believe that relationship with friends and family are source of happiness and not materialistic things. As materialist things will only provide a short term happiness or content to a person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent empirical research'.
Suggestion: recent empirical research
...ilestone in their lives. To illustrate, a recent empirical research by Oxford University demonstrates that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 506, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...heir family and children's future. Thus it is possible to state beyond doubt th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45192307692 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9470016605 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2760838351 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3125 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177275925757 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542562965262 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356166602917 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101381037419 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496752872383 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.