Nowadays, pollution and waste levels are increasing rapidly. How does this affect ordinary people? What steps can be taken to overcome this problem?
The drastic increase in pollution and waste level has adverse effects on human health. This situation could be improved if adequate waste management techniques were implemented in the first place, and appropriate actions were taken by the government to control the pollution.
Public health deterioration is the most serious danger associated with the surge in pollution and waste level. With regard to pollution, the high use of diesel and petrol vehicles, especially private cars and bikes, deteriorates the air quality with the emission of toxic gases. This polluted air causes severe respiratory diseases and also dangerous for our lungs. The increased level of garbage produced is another major health concern for the general public. As a result of this rise, waste is not efficiently disposed of, and overflowing dustbins and cluttered streets become an ideal breeding ground for bacteria, insects and vermin, which leads to disease outbreak such as, dengue fever, food poisoning and flu.
Government initiatives and efficient waste management could offer the best chance of reducing the health risks related to the rise in pollution and waste level. As far as the role of government is concerned, public awareness should be spread to use more public transport for work and how the use of it could control air pollution. People should also be encouraged to use bicycle and eco-friendly cars. This would have a significant improvement in air quality. As for the waste level control, people should be guided to change the existing practice to dump the garbage. This could be achieved by reducing the daily produced junk, recycling the rubbish as much as we can, and segregating the litter into different bins before dumping it. By doing so, the waste level could be reduced.
In conclusion, growing pollution and increased rubbish level impact the general public health in many ways. This problem can be alleviated by the government's appropriate response and with fundamental reform in waste management.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...is another major health concern for the general public. As a result of this rise, waste is not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... and increased rubbish level impact the general public health in many ways. This problem can b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, as for, in conclusion, such as, as a result, with regard to, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.309375 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7239802421 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56875 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7200134377 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.1875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291834142058 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104266981796 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497810638213 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198549826345 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440616071035 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.