Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years technological advancements have been so rapidly integrated into our life's. Many times we are unaware of the fact we are under constant monitoring via surveillance systems and location tracking. Whenever we use any form of communication devices government tracks each activity. Is this, however a development we should welcome?
Certainly there are benefits for having such surveillance. Having such close observations is quite necessary in some cases. This is to prevent terrorism and illegal activities. Such information systems help us in identifying hidden patterns used by criminals while communicating with each other. Government bodies can thus take necessary steps to prevent catastrophic events. For instance, a person who is kidnapped can easily call 911 and the police can locate the whereabouts of suspect or victim.
On the other hand, there are a number of concerns. In countries where human rights are ignored, use of cameras and listening devices can be harmful to society. People should be able to hold meetings or express their opinions without their privacy being invaded. Another issue we should consider is. Nowadays, people upload their personal information and photographs into social networking sites; they often do not realize how easy it is for other people to view this information or for the site owner to use the data or photos for their own financial gain.
To sum up, it is inevitable that there will be more and more ways to monitor society in future. However, it is our responsibility to evaluate new technology and decide whether it will do more harm than good. Surely, our freedom is more valuable than technological progress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whenever” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eillance systems and location tracking. Whenever we use any form of communication device...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 86, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e more and more ways to monitor society in future. However, it is our responsibility to e...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in some cases, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28996282528 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90149115641 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654275092937 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0370227591 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0555555556 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9444444444 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226951839545 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522365315662 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451049142006 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112701018851 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556227503357 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.