Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can government do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
In recent times the amount of waste produced by humans is increasing year after year in a dangerous proportion. Almost every industry is adding more and more rubbish to the already saturated environment. For example, the tech companies every year put the newest model of their flagship mobile phone on the market. This dated model is not much different than the previous one, simply newer. That isn't a reason for stopping people from flooding the stores to get it as soon as possible. Almost all the discarded mobile phones became garbage later on. People buy these new items not for necessity but for status and fashion. This has to change natural resources are running out as fast as the new smartwatch comes out.
The manufacturing industry is advancing faster every day, with loads of new gadgets, toys, tools, and practically everything that comes to our minds is produced right now. People are eager to get the latest mobile phones, or tablets making the older ones' disposables and not many countries are ready to deal properly with this amount of rubbish. That is just one example of how consumerism is a big part of the problem.
Obviously, governments are not doing enough to control the production of garbage. They need to make better laws to reduce the number of waste industries are throwing into the environment, they must educate the population from a younger age to reach bigger levels of consciousness about taking care of the planet. Moreover, every person should be accountable for making the best use of natural resources and man-made gadgets
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... This dated model is not much different than the previous one, simply newer. That is...
^^^^
Line 1, column 396, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...an the previous one, simply newer. That isnt a reason for stopping people from flood...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96958174905 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56828274864 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638783269962 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3553268409 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3571428571 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92857142857 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144207218485 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435858602711 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570812089257 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837326052207 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218337810775 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.