we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can government do to help reduce the
amount of rubbish produced?
Undoubtedly, the bar of waste material is exaggerating day by day which has ultimately become the concerning issue around the globe. This essay asserts that the possible reason behind the menace is the use-throw culture of society which could be tackled by promoting recycling.
Since, ever-burgeoning population creates the excessive demand which further turns into one time consumption of products, therefore amount of rubbish escalate briskly. Seemingly, the dawn of industrialisation has flooded the markets with variety of goods at reasonable prices that surge the purchasing power of potential buyers. Consequently, customers are more inclined towards single use culture due to the easy availability. It would be biased to overlook the data published by United Nation environment programme stating that Japan has topped that index of solid waste production due in bygone year where populace believe in purchasing new merchandise instead of fixing it.
Even though, recycling plants require initially hefty investments, reusing the solid material is an impeccable measure to alleviate the produced scrap. This way giant machineries will convert the waste into productive commodities owing to which scale of trash will gradually decline. Indeed government should emphasis on reuseable projects and ensures the effective utilisation of resources. To exemplify, Singapore has installed recycling units in each city in which damaged electronics devices are being repaired due to theprofilirated demands, resultingly the country is cherishing success by marginalising quantity of rubbish.
To conclude, this trend of irrational consumption is going to increase in upcoming morrow thus statutory bodies need to operate more corporations typically associated with reprocessing activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation environment programme stating that Japan has topped that index of solid was...
^^
Line 3, column 680, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g new merchandise instead of fixing it. Even though, recycling plants require in...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
... scale of trash will gradually decline. Indeed government should emphasis on reuseable...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by marginalising quantity of rubbish. To conclude, this trend of irrational co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, look, so, therefore, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97297297297 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12775154278 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.706563706564 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8325661928 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.636363636 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103552415001 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332310632599 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253207583823 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0543817598644 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226461528973 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.24 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.