Nowadays young people are preferred more as compared with old people applying for same jobs. What are the reasons? What are some possible solutions for the problem?
Competition has become very common in every field.Eventually this has led to unemployment in senior citizens as most of the employers prefer the young crowd. This essay will discuss few steps that should be taken to cure the problem.
Undoubtedly, the youth of our country are energetic, enthusiastic and have broad vision. The young ones are preferred more when the company recruits people for particular vacancy. This is because, adults having the basic qualification for the particular job are chosen over the highly skilled and experienced people, as they are ready to take up the job with less salary.
Nevertheless, there are some ways that might resolve the issue of jobless old people. Firstly, the public authority should reduce the retirement age from 65 to 60 years. It is observed that people’s body start to wear and tear in their early 60’s, which was not the scenario in earlier days. Hence, by bringing the retirement age to 60 years it would help senior people to work effectively before their body stop supporting them to work hard.
Secondly, there are many jobs where experience maters as compared with qualification. For instance, in politics as well in police force, a person with more experience are required. Although, young propensity can work hard and think out of the box, but it is the experienced one which gives more fruitful results. Also for positions in higher management experience should be given preference. As only height trained and skilled people can prove their role for such vacancies.
To recapitulate, higher rate of unemployment is observed in senior citizen due to competition with youth. This can be resolved by decreasing the retirement age and also by considering experience rather than education for few vacancies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Eventually
...n has become very common in every field.Eventually this has led to unemployment in senior ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... one which gives more fruitful results. Also for positions in higher management expe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20138888889 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88306537772 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607638888889 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.342680981 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.625 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220524048575 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684767195363 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608134330855 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10807679162 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562162932723 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.