People should focus more on solving problems related to the future, and should not
spend time thinking about the past.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
It is a controversial issue of whether people should give importance to find solutions for future related items or analyse on the actions that occurred in the past. While I believe that answers for upcoming happenings can guide to a stress-free life, I also think previous incidents offer more experience and shape a responsible man. The following paragraphs will elaborate on why both views are essential.
On the one hand, tackling issues which may occur in future would aid to live a comfortable life. In other words, people will be prepared to face any obstacles which can appear in their future. Besides, earlier planning makes a person more persuasive and confident throughout his life. A man who plans to invest money for building a house in the next five years will be out of stress and will lead a successful life. These are the reasons why some people focus more on their plans.
On the other hand, it is also significant to spend time investigating the right and wrong in past deeds. The actions will make sure that people learn from their mistakes and endeavour to avoid repeating them in their whole life. In addition, thinking about the past sometimes increases responsibilities, which would be beneficial in addressing every matter with great care. For example, if a man misses his valuable items because of his activities, he would ensure to avoid such circumstances in the future.
In conclusion, some people give attention to future problems, where as others try to engage their present time to think about their past actions. I agree that solving future issues earlier makes life more comfortable when understanding previous incidents outcomes build a responsible and experienced person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ople give attention to future problems, where as others try to engage their present time...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08510638298 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78896594993 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59219858156 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.875150345 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.428571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18213868311 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600088251417 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484040462587 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113946152418 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030827297163 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.